DSiders,
Thank you for proving my point. "Just do this.....", problem ditched.
I hope you realise there are a fair amount of users who resort to handoko's method of cutting the PHPSESSID part of links which, if you ask me, is not a really normal use of links?
The whole argument has bit of a "You're holding it wrong" feel to it. As i stated earlier, cookies aren't even disabled here. It's checked, checked, double cheched. and when i was absolutely sure.... I checked it again. Blame firefox all you want, if chrome and vivaldi users have the same problems..... perhaps it may not be firefox but a well-intended but not so great executed change server-side.
There's also the "Bot's don't use cookies" logic fallacy which is easlily bypassed with a oneliner. Again, cut the PHPSESSID part from the link and a bot has access to the content, yet users are dancing naked in the moonlight shaking their tambourines.
I get that this policy was enforced with all well-meaning in mind, i just doubt this was the intended effect.
Or are we so seriously indoctrinated that cookies are so convenient that no matter at what cost, the end justifies the means?