TSizeUIntDynArray and TSizeIntDynArray

[LemonParty]

I think given types should be added to unit Types.

[Thausand]

I think given types should be added to unit Types.

TSizeUIntDynArray

No !, Size is sign int (when use for index).

TSizeIntDynArray

Code: Pascal  [Select][+][-]

1.  
2. type TSizeIntDynArray   = specialize TArray<SizeInt>;
3.  

Done 

[LemonParty]

No !, Size is sign int (when use for index).

What do you mean by that?

[Thaddy]

sizes can not be negative????? So are always unsigned.

[Khrys]

These types are trivial to define and also assignment-compatible when defined multiple times in different units, so I see no point in this. I'd leave this to the programmer.

If anything, I'd like  TIntegerArray  to be removed from  objpas.  Why pollute the namespace with a historical hack that only exists to emulate raw pointers? Why is a fixed-size 960 MiB block of integers considered important enough to be defined in  objpas  of all places?

(I know it's for historical reasons and should not be removed - it's just funny to see archaic 16-bit era  ifdefs  fifteen lines above  generic TArray<T> = array of T;   )

[Thausand]

No !, Size is sign int (when use for index).

What do you mean by that?

I make sorry. As write Thaddy I make dumdum mistake when write that and was confuse with index iterator (must signed with for loop).