What you wrote is very reminiscent of so-called "over-intellectualized" pseudo-philosophical books or movies - it is so naive.
That I wrote is not "pseudo-philosophy", but a simple deduction based on your own logical postulates. In a mathematical analogy, I might call it extrapolation.
Extrapolation is not always right. It is used by making certain assumptions that may not necessarily be correct or fulfilled. For example, we assume that the curve outside the measurement range (forward or backward) will follow a similar course to the trend line determined from the measurement points. Meanwhile, this may not be true, because we don't have any data to confirm it. So extrapolation is always a bit of speculation.
According to your own arguments, you yourself are a product of blind evolution.
Then why do you think that the products of your life activity are not the continuation of blind evolution? They exactly are. Like an anthill or a hive in the insect world.
Because I am aware of what I am doing. You know very well that consciousness in different living organisms (insects, vertebrates, and in particular many mammals, primates and finally humans) has different degrees. You've gone way overboard with simplifying this issue.
If this were true, other species would also be highly developed and would have created some civilizations. Do you see any other than humans? Yes, some people do not control their fate, they behave like animals (they follow their instincts), but not all. Therefore, for many biologists and anthropologists it is a mystery how consciousness in humans and the desire to change their lives, sometimes/often against instincts, came to be.
And this is where you contradict yourself. But this is already good, because the classical ideas of self-generation and evolution are still just a theory.
All experiments on self-generation have failed and no transitional forms have been found.
So again, it's not far to accepting the creation theory. But this is another conversation and not for this thread 
What do you mean by self-generation? Because I didn't write anything like that. I only wrote about the creation of civilization by humans. That's not self-generation.
And one more thing - you use the term: theory. In the world of science, a theory is a description of a phenomenon or process that has been thoroughly studied. Mathematical models are often part of a theory (especially in physics). You probably meant a hypothesis (assumption) based on a certain set of premises (which may be incomplete or fragmentary). Only, hypotheses are tested (verified) by conducting research (sometimes it takes a really long time). And either theories are created from them (when the results of research confirm these assumptions) or they are rejected as false (e.g. the ether or phlogiston hypothesis).
Closer to our topic, Moore's law no longer works as it did 20 years ago and soon we'll run into the physical limitations of transistors.
But it is likely that extensive development will continue for a very long time.
Yes, but this so-called "Moore's Law" is more of a lapidary statement (although to some extent it was quite accurate) than an actual law of physics. Besides, physicists have known for a long time that one day people would "hit the wall" in terms of miniaturization of transistors. It was just a matter of time.
Just check what size the smallest transistor currently is and compare it to the size of a silicon atom. And the smallest possible transistor will definitely have to be larger than the size of an atom (Si).
And those who like to save every byte and every CPU cycle now and in the near future will be needed more on embedded controllers than on the desktop apps.
But if only for save CPU cycles then in the game engine creation or in the high perfomance computation tasks (where is С/C++ is still the king).
It's hard to say what will happen in a few years. You can make assumptions, but they are always just speculation.
WIKI Timeout issues
