Forum > Debugger
Feature request/suggestion
440bx:
I would base its implementation strictly on "number of milliseconds elapsed"
Thaddy:
--- Quote from: 440bx on November 14, 2024, 07:14:39 am ---I would base its implementation strictly on "number of milliseconds elapsed"
--- End quote ---
That is the 640k question: very rough quantification. I would choose an equally arbitrary nanoseconds elapsed, which is at this moment of writing a better approximation of time elapsed. Or go to picoseconds, but that requires dedicated hardware atm.
440bx:
I wouldn't try to get fancy. To ensure a reasonable CPU load, I'd first try 15ms. This is short enough that it normally feels instantaneous without overly burdening the CPU.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page