I see a opportunity for the free pascal community to take the lead when linux community goes into a frenzy.
This is... wild, to say the least. First of all, you think that what happens on the Linux Foundation side (which doesn't deal with just Linux, but also projects like Ceph, Xen, Let's Encrypt, PyTorch, RISC-V etc.) is of any concern to Free Pascal. GCC is more relevant to Linux than Free Pascal, and believing otherwise is pure delusion. Not surprising from someone fear-mongering and finding the absolute worst source you could for Linux news (Lunduke).
Weather (sic!) you believe in it or not is irrelevant because everyone is allowed to have an idea unless you are a dictator.
Flat Earth or "Tomatoes are blue" are also ideas, but are they correct? Everyone is allowed to have an idea, yes, but because you posted this on a public forum it mustn't go unchallenged, because otherwise that's how you get misinformation.
I am just saying that this mess with the linux kernel could lead to fragmentation of the community. As far as I am concerned linux is going to fall apart.
And that's because... um, a couple of maintainers were kicked? Are you for real? More people probably left Linux when Linus added Rust to the kernel than because of this nothing burger. You and Steve Ballmer are on the same level of enthusiasm and delusion to believe Linux is going to fall apart. Linux didn't fall apart in the 90s, Linux didn't fall apart in the 00s and it certainly doesn't fall apart now. This is plain misinformation and ragebait. I suppose your fingers were bored and wanted some action after watching your favorite "unbiased" news. Or Fox News, either one works.
This is a good opportunity fore the free pascal community to do a operating system that learns from the mistakes of the linux foundation. Would love to hear what the community thinks about these events.
Let's assume for a moment you're right (which is a big stretch). What makes you think that other communities wouldn't do the same and why would we be more successful? You have plenty of kernels to choose from (FOSS, ignoring Linux and the BSDs). If you really want Free Pascal, you have a couple of options, like:
Why are
you fragmenting the community by wanting to make yet another OS, when you've got so many options? For something a tad bit more useful, the ETH Zürich team would really like your help extending and improving Oberon. Even improving
https://ironclad.nongnu.org/, which is a "formally verified, hard real-time capable kernel for general-purpose and embedded uses, written in SPARK and Ada", would be amazing, and it is quite unique among kernels.
The people that are the most willing to do an alternative OS to Linux is... the Rust people.
https://www.redox-os.org/ is probably the most notable Rust OS, and they could have the man power to pull off an usable OS (I personally wish those man-years could be spent into Haiku or ReactOS or AROS, but that's just me). We don't have the man power necessary, not even if you bring all somewhat active people, to do something like this. But if you truly believe Linux is going to fail, you still have the BSDs, and none of them are concerned about what happens to Linux (maybe FreeBSD cares a little bit, maybe...). You can always go to Windows or macOS or some other proprietary OS if you so wish, but I would hope that goes against your beliefs. Lead the path to a better OS, make a GitHub/GitLab/... repo with your OS and your vision for how it should be, and other people will follow suit if you can display competence, ambition and perseverance. Rēs, nōn verba. Maybe you are somehow smarter than Linus and all contributors (that intelligence should've guided you towards avoiding fear-mongering and watching Lunduke, but I digress...) and your day is 72 hours long and you can be the one to do it and compete with the likes of Haiku, ReactOS, AROS, Redox, SerenityOS etc. But I doubt it.