Recent

Author Topic: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions  (Read 20640 times)

Fred vS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • StrumPract is the musicians best friend
FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions
« on: November 10, 2021, 11:06:46 pm »
Hello.

Only out of (big) curiosity, version 3.0.0 was called "Pestering Peacock".

Quote
We are happy to announce the release of the Free Pascal Compiler version
3.0.0 "Pestering Peacock".

What will be the name of 3.2.4 ?
( Or maybe "Pestering Peacock" is for all the 3.x.x versions, if so, sorry for the noise. )

Fre;D
I use Lazarus 2.2.0 32/64 and FPC 3.2.2 32/64 on Debian 11 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 7 32/64, Windows XP 32,  FreeBSD 64.
Widgetset: fpGUI, MSEgui, Win32, GTK2, Qt.

https://github.com/fredvs
https://gitlab.com/fredvs
https://codeberg.org/fredvs

PascalDragon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
  • Compiler Developer
FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2021, 09:04:42 am »
Only out of (big) curiosity, version 3.0.0 was called "Pestering Peacock".

Quote
We are happy to announce the release of the Free Pascal Compiler version
3.0.0 "Pestering Peacock".

What will be the name of 3.2.4 ?
( Or maybe "Pestering Peacock" is for all the 3.x.x versions, if so, sorry for the noise. )

There is none (though I personally think of 3.2.0 as “The Neverending Story”, cause it took so long from branch till release :-[ ). The name for 3.0.0 was an inside joke, cause at the hackathon we FPC devs had back in 2013 in Bingen we had a peacock as neighbour who has making rather annoying noises all day long (and 3.0.0 was the first release after that :P ).

Fred vS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • StrumPract is the musicians best friend
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2021, 03:27:00 pm »
Only out of (big) curiosity, version 3.0.0 was called "Pestering Peacock".

Quote
We are happy to announce the release of the Free Pascal Compiler version
3.0.0 "Pestering Peacock".

What will be the name of 3.2.4 ?
( Or maybe "Pestering Peacock" is for all the 3.x.x versions, if so, sorry for the noise. )

There is none (though I personally think of 3.2.0 as “The Neverending Story”, cause it took so long from branch till release :-[ ). The name for 3.0.0 was an inside joke, cause at the hackathon we FPC devs had back in 2013 in Bingen we had a peacock as neighbour who has making rather annoying noises all day long (and 3.0.0 was the first release after that :P ).

Hello.

Ha OK.

By the way, personally I like when projects have name for release.
Like Debian ( a hero from Toy Story ) or Ubuntu ( a animal + his quality ).

Fre;D
I use Lazarus 2.2.0 32/64 and FPC 3.2.2 32/64 on Debian 11 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 7 32/64, Windows XP 32,  FreeBSD 64.
Widgetset: fpGUI, MSEgui, Win32, GTK2, Qt.

https://github.com/fredvs
https://gitlab.com/fredvs
https://codeberg.org/fredvs

marcov

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11923
  • FPC developer.
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2021, 03:56:43 pm »
By the way, personally I like when projects have name for release.
Like Debian ( a hero from Toy Story ) or Ubuntu ( a animal + his quality ).

While fun, it makes references to versions in normal messages insider jokes. From a version number you can determine the sequence of releases, from a name not. So I'm not in favour of making this a habit.

I wonder however if 3.2.0's process was really that slower than 3.0.0 (or 2.6.0). Major branch releases tend to move slowly.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 01:03:51 pm by marcov »

Fred vS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • StrumPract is the musicians best friend
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2021, 04:31:55 pm »
While fun ...

Is it not the most important ?

From a version number you can determine the sequence of releases, from a name not.

Hum, more or less.
For example, Ubuntu uses alphabetic order.
You can imagine to use 3 words, the first for the global release number, the 2th for sub-release and the 3th for sub-sub release.

For example for fpc 3.0.0 it is "Peacock Pestering Amazing".
For fpc 3.0.2  it could be "Peacock Pestering Beautiful"
For fpc 3.2.0  it could be "Peacock QAnon Amazing"
For fpc 3.2.2 it could be "Peacock QAnon Beautiful"
For fpc 3.2.4 it could be "Peacock QAnon Carfuly"

[EDIT]
Of course the name is there "just for fun", the release numbers still stay.
And to be more "alphabetic" it could be:

For fpc 3.0.0: "Cock Adorable Amazing".
For fpc 3.0.2  it could be "Cock Adorable Beautiful"
For fpc 3.2.0  it could be "Cock Brutish Amazing"
For fpc 3.2.2 it could be "Cock Brutish Beautiful"
For fpc 3.2.4 it could be "Cock Brutish Carfuly"

etc...

PS: Just for fun, of course.

Fre;D
« Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 05:02:47 pm by Fred vS »
I use Lazarus 2.2.0 32/64 and FPC 3.2.2 32/64 on Debian 11 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 7 32/64, Windows XP 32,  FreeBSD 64.
Widgetset: fpGUI, MSEgui, Win32, GTK2, Qt.

https://github.com/fredvs
https://gitlab.com/fredvs
https://codeberg.org/fredvs

marcov

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11923
  • FPC developer.
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2021, 05:30:00 pm »
IMHO regulating fun is not fun :-)


Fred vS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • StrumPract is the musicians best friend
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2021, 05:38:33 pm »
IMHO regulating fun is not fun :-)

In the beginning was the Word...  O:-)  ( yes I know, I said it already ...)
I use Lazarus 2.2.0 32/64 and FPC 3.2.2 32/64 on Debian 11 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 7 32/64, Windows XP 32,  FreeBSD 64.
Widgetset: fpGUI, MSEgui, Win32, GTK2, Qt.

https://github.com/fredvs
https://gitlab.com/fredvs
https://codeberg.org/fredvs

FPK

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 118
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2021, 10:24:47 pm »
Hello.

Only out of (big) curiosity, version 3.0.0 was called "Pestering Peacock".

Quote
We are happy to announce the release of the Free Pascal Compiler version
3.0.0 "Pestering Peacock".

What will be the name of 3.2.4 ?
( Or maybe "Pestering Peacock" is for all the 3.x.x versions, if so, sorry for the noise. )

Fre;D

Gorgeous git ;)?

marcov

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11923
  • FPC developer.
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2021, 11:21:27 pm »
Gorgeous git ;)?

Other adjectives come to mind ::)

ccrause

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 970
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2021, 08:32:42 am »
Gorgeous git ;)?

Other adjectives come to mind ::)

Perhaps The unbearable slowness of the GitLab web interface  :o.  OK, I guess that is unfair since git itself is very snappy...

FPK

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 118
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2021, 06:37:01 pm »

dsiders

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2021, 06:41:37 pm »
Preview the next Lazarus documentation release at: https://dsiders.gitlab.io/lazdocsnext

AlexTP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2478
    • UVviewsoft
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions ...
« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2021, 07:13:29 pm »
Or any other animal from R ! https://alphabetimals.com/animal-dictionary/animals-that-start-with-r/

eg Rearranged Racoon.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2021, 07:15:23 pm by Alextp »

zeljko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1668
    • http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User:Zeljan
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2023, 06:47:46 pm »
Waiting for Godot ?  O:-)

Bogen85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: FPC 3.2.4, naming suggestions
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2023, 07:29:11 pm »
Code: Text  [Select][+][-]
  1. @2023-02-09 12:26:21 CST [Sent]
  2. FPC 3.0.0 was named "Pestering Peacock".
  3. What should FPC 3.2.4 be named?
  4. @2023-02-09 12:26:33 CST [Received]
  5. "Rambunctious Raven"

"Rambunctious Raven" is good, but likely not characteristic of a stable branch.



 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018