Recent

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: No plan to implement SCGI?  (Read 2491 times)

egsuh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
No plan to implement SCGI?
« on: August 05, 2024, 10:03:05 am »
I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Common_Gateway_Interface. Isn't there any plan to implement SCGI in Lazarus? As it says,

Quote
The ISAPI SCGI extension adds support for the Simple Common Gateway Interface protocol to IIS. SCGI is a standard for communicating between web servers and application servers on the back end offering similar benefits to FastCGI but significantly simpler.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2024, 10:53:49 am by egsuh »
Logged

egsuh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: No plan to implement SCGI?
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2024, 03:54:29 pm »
I’m testing with nginx 1.27 and Windows 11 and FCGI. Up to now no error. I found only single instance of fcgi program and module in it.
Logged

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18729
  • To Europe: simply sell USA bonds: dollar collapses
Re: No plan to implement SCGI?
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2024, 04:25:35 pm »
It is not difficult to write it based on more than 80% of the code of fastcgi, but someone simply has to do it. I am not one of them.
Logged
If Europe sells their USA bonds the USD will collapse. Europe can affort that given average state debts. The USA can't affort that. Just an advice...

egsuh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: No plan to implement SCGI?
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2024, 06:21:13 am »
Quote
It is not difficult to write it based on more than 80% of the code of fastcgi, but someone simply has to do it. I am not one of them.

I'd like to do, but I cannot delve into source codes of FCGI etc. But if FCGI is stable enough then it's enough. I'm not having any problem with newly-setup nginx + FCGI combination. However problems happened after quite a while in the past.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018