Sorry for my english . i didn't mean rate, but ratio...
reread please:
Question:
Amine, you are a socialist, who implemented Parallel archiver,
and you have said that the compression ratio of your Parallel archiver with maximum level compression is the same as WinZip with maximum level
compression, but it's less on compression ratio than 7Zip eith maximun level compression by 15% to 17%, cause 7Zip uses "block solid compression" , have you
something else to add ?
Answer:
Read this:
"We're a video sharing site located in China. We rewrote the PHP memcached client extension by replacing zlib with QuickLZ. Then our server loads were dramatically reduced by up to 50%, the page response time was also boosted. Thanks for your great work!
Jiang Hong"
http://www.quicklz.com/testimonials.htmlhttp://www.quicklz.com/So as you have noticed , like QuickLZ or qpress, i have
implemented Parallel archiver with the idea to favor
speed over compression ratio, so with with maximum level compression my Parallel archiver is the same
as WinZip but less than 7Zip by 15% to 17%, but by using
my Parallel Zlib or my Parallel LZO my Parallel archiver will
be very fast and as i have wrote in my webpage:
So now you have all the methods to use my Parallel archiver as a Hashtable from the hardisk with direct access to the compressed and/or encrypted data with O(1) very fast acces to the data , the DeleteFiles() has a O(1) complexity the ExtractFiles() and Extract() have also O(1) complexity and GetInfo() is also O(1) and of course the AddFiles() is also O(1), the Test() method is also O(1). So now it's extremely fast.
So as you have noticed since my Parallel archiver favor speed over the compression ratio, you can use it as a hash table database from the Harddisk to lower more the load (from internet or intranet) on you server and boost the response time...
You can download my Parallel archiver from:
http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/Amine Moulay Ramdane.