Recent

Author Topic: No plan to implement SCGI?  (Read 1622 times)

egsuh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
No plan to implement SCGI?
« on: August 05, 2024, 10:03:05 am »
I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Common_Gateway_Interface. Isn't there any plan to implement SCGI in Lazarus? As it says,

Quote
The ISAPI SCGI extension adds support for the Simple Common Gateway Interface protocol to IIS. SCGI is a standard for communicating between web servers and application servers on the back end offering similar benefits to FastCGI but significantly simpler.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2024, 10:53:49 am by egsuh »

egsuh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
Re: No plan to implement SCGI?
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2024, 03:54:29 pm »
I’m testing with nginx 1.27 and Windows 11 and FCGI. Up to now no error. I found only single instance of fcgi program and module in it.

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15524
  • Censorship about opinions does not belong here.
Re: No plan to implement SCGI?
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2024, 04:25:35 pm »
It is not difficult to write it based on more than 80% of the code of fastcgi, but someone simply has to do it. I am not one of them.
My great hero has found the key to the highway. Rest in peace John Mayall.
Playing: "Broken Wings" in your honour. As well as taking out some mouth organs.

egsuh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
Re: No plan to implement SCGI?
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2024, 06:21:13 am »
Quote
It is not difficult to write it based on more than 80% of the code of fastcgi, but someone simply has to do it. I am not one of them.

I'd like to do, but I cannot delve into source codes of FCGI etc. But if FCGI is stable enough then it's enough. I'm not having any problem with newly-setup nginx + FCGI combination. However problems happened after quite a while in the past.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018