Thanks for the correction
No, no correction. My comment was more to Mark who in a previous post miss credited the quote.
As long as you have language dependent tasks, Language Models can help you (you may need some fine tuning).
Certainly. But as I established, maybe help but not a lot. But more importantly, at a cost -
Sorry, its not really going to be a big help and I might end up with some code in my project that I don't understand ? Or has a dubious copyright ?
I don't want code I cannot understand in my project and I most certainly don't want, as any cost, code in my project that breaches someone else's copyright.
Are you sure the help you got in your project is not subject to some unidentified copyright ? I understand you are an Academic, you must publish your research and always attribute your sources ?
There is a lot of Open Source code out there, code that the AI can spend it's quiet evenings reading. But being Open Source does not necessarily mean its free for the AI to take and give to you. Most Open Source code is subject to a specific license that may require attribution, may obligate the user to mark the work, it self, the same license, may put constraints on how it is used. Its even harder if the Open Source code does not have a license, then default conditions apply, they vary around the world and are vague and confusing.
Sorry cpicanco, this is sounding like a personal attack and its definitely not meant to be. I am sure your academic behaviour is totally correct. But if we let the AI contribute to our projects, we need to understand the implications. If you quote, as co-authors, every one who indirectly contributed to your next publication, it could look like a High Energy Physics paper.
So, your "Call for action" - please AI, tell us what we ask, but also tell us how you (the AI) found the answer.
Davo