Forum > Other
Using chatgpt to bring the pascal/lazarus platform up to date more quickly.
dbannon:
--- Quote from: MarkMLl on January 12, 2023, 12:08:47 pm ---
--- End quote ---
Because it has no legal standing it is unable to utter a license or make any statement which would be admissible in a dispute.
[/quote]
Many of the evils of this world can be traced back to a decision to grant to (eg) companies much of the legal rights once reserved for a person. In many ways, an AI possibly has a better case to be granted those same legal rights.
Sadly, Isaac Asimov's Three Laws do not look like becoming a prerequisite.
Davo
Webdrifter:
--- Quote from: dbannon on January 13, 2023, 12:47:34 am ---Many of the evils of this world can be traced back to a decision to grant to (eg) companies much of the legal rights once reserved for a person. In many ways, an AI possibly has a better case to be granted those same legal rights.
Sadly, Isaac Asimov's Three Laws do not look like becoming a prerequisite.
Davo
--- End quote ---
That is off course an entirely different discussion which should be started in another thread.
And to help you with that start I will give you one comment concerning this item.
Asimov's laws are flawed !!!
His first law states: "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."
So now how would a specific robot define "injure" and "harm"!
Is intimidation a form of injury or harm, and what about the use off force without bloodshed?
And what will he have to decide when he has to kill somebody to prevent two (or more?) other persons to be killed?
Do different rules apply to police or battlefield robots?
How can we prevent battlefield robots from being programmed in ways we don't want?
How can we prevent the programs of battlefield robots from being used in non-battlefield situations?
So Asimov's laws are crude guidelines at best.
And dangerous, because they create a false illusion about the manageability of the risks that AI entails!!!
I predict that robots will first become a tool in the hands off the powerful, and next will become a power themselves....
marcov:
IIRC Asimov says (in one of the Susan Calvin novels) that the words of the law are a rough approximation of positronic circuits only.
MarkMLl:
And in any case, the whole point of the stories- or at least the original ones- was the things that didn't work quite as people expected.
MarkMLl
440bx:
I figured I'd post this here instead of starting a new thread ...
A.I seems to be getting a lot of attention these days and while it seems to be able to fake intelligence to some extent - it can certainly glue words together - the semantic value of the result is often "questionable".
One such example of rather questionable results occurred when Ann Reardon (dietitian and baker) asked ChatGPT for a cake recipe. She attempted to make the "A.I cake", the process was recorded in the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUqPOsgu0uo
Personally, I found the whole thing quite amusing and quite indicative of A.I's _true_ capabilities.
IMO, that baby still has a very long way to go.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page