Thank you Serge.If I understood you correctly, it is not possible then to have a small range, e.g, 1..100, use a DWORD.
If I understood you correctly, it is not possible then to have a small range, e.g, 1..100, use a DWORD. It will use the smallest type that can encompass the range (in that case, byte.)Did I get it right ?
Is there some way of defining the range to have the compiler consider it a DWORD ?