Recent

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Box2D Status  (Read 1698 times)

mosquito

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
Box2D Status
« on: February 06, 2022, 10:16:31 am »
I have read contradictory opinions in the forum about the Box2D port. Someone could tell me the current status ?
  • This compiles Mac, Linux, Win?
  • Is the right way OPM?
  • A Hello World?
  • Should I use it in a separate thread?
Logged

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14364
  • Sensorship about opinions does not belong here.
Re: Box2D Status
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2022, 10:21:41 am »
Quote from: mosquito on February 06, 2022, 10:16:31 am
I have read contradictory opinions in the forum about the Box2D port.
Where? Somebody was shouting nonsense?

More in general box2d is portable on most platforms. It is also a standard for 2D.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2022, 10:23:29 am by Thaddy »
Logged
Object Pascal programmers should get rid of their "component fetish" especially with the non-visuals.

mosquito

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
Re: Box2D Status
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2022, 10:35:56 am »
I suppose they are only different points of view.

In any case someone said: Box2D is the simplest way.

While someone said: Box2D and Chipmunk are problematic, confusing and difficult to implement.
Logged

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14364
  • Sensorship about opinions does not belong here.
Re: Box2D Status
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2022, 01:39:24 pm »
That is not helpful, unless their real name is actually "Someone"....
Logged
Object Pascal programmers should get rid of their "component fetish" especially with the non-visuals.
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018