Can somebody provide an update on defining records using named fields at runtime? I believe that this was supposed to be implemented at some point but I've just been idly experimenting and it doesn't (yet) work.
This is not supported and there are no plans to do so.
OK. My mistake, I thought you'd said in the past that this sort of tuple would eventually be supported.
Unfortunate decision IMO, since I've had situations in the past where changing the number of parameters of a function with a final optional parameter resulted in a bug which was very difficult to pin down, and being able to pass parameters by name rather than position would avoid that.
MarkMLl