No Sir
it's NOT GPL licensed
Sternas, they are GPL licensed because they are part of your Lazarus fork which is GPL licensed.
That is how GPL works.
Please note that copying your improved GPL code is not a hostile act in any way. The whole essence of FOSS development is to copy, modify and spread other people's code. You have done it and I appreciate it. Yes, I feel honored that my GPL code has been worth copying. I hope you feel honored that your GPL embedded designer was worth copying for us.
Please remember that
none of Lazarus core developers have attacked your project. It was done by other people. Some of them gave an impression they represent Lazarus project, which was a nasty and ugly thing to do.
When the heat was on a few years ago, I studied both (L)GPL and your forked code. I didn't find any license violations, except for a minor forgotten license header from new files(*).
You had removed author info from some packages but most of them are fixed AFAIK.
Author information is not required or even mentioned in GPL. Thus removing it is not a license violation but it violates copyright rules.
Still I feel the whole mudslinging went totally out of proportions.
Everybody please try to understand what a FOSS license GPL is about.
The license encourages to copy, modify and spread code. It has two essential rules:
1. Modified source code must be published somehow when binaries built from it are delivered.
2. The license of the modified source code must remain the same GPL.
Pilot Logic has followed those license rules (except the minor header omissions*).
(*) Sternas, GPL requires the license header in every source file.
You had forgotten it from the embedded designer files, thus they were added to the Lazarus copy.
No big deal, I have forgotten those headers many times from new files. I have added them only later.