Forum > Unix
about #0034416: EPoll_Event struct size
baldzhang:
Hi, I met this issue yesterday, search the bug tracker and found #0034416
already add a note there.
could any one have a look of it please?
I'm not familiar with mailing list and do not know how to post/reply... sorry about that. %)
baldzhang:
Is it possible to merge r43880 and r44093 to 3.2 ?
r43880 (fix #0036528)
and
r44093 (fix #0034416)
hope it is not too late to merge them.
** I try to post this to mailing list, sent success but not shown in list archive, may be my email address is banned**
although my register email received ok....
Thaddy:
Marcov does most of the merges and he reads this, so:
Marco, can you merge them? They are both non-intrusive.
marcov:
--- Quote from: Thaddy on February 12, 2020, 08:57:07 am ---Marcov does most of the merges and he reads this, so:
Marco, can you merge them? They are both non-intrusive.
--- End quote ---
During the week, depending on time, I only merge easy stuff. I had already looked at the revs, but they didn't seem easy. First, syscall changes are never nonintrusive.
43880:
It has to be checked if 3.2 already contains that newfsstatat call.
And finally, a build has to be done to test for issues, since lstat is used in things like findfirst, which are critical to the compiler.
44093 I already test merged, but had a conflict on the test. Looking into it costs too much time now
So both -> weekend, unless I get feedback from Florian.
baldzhang:
thanks marcov
now I know this is complex than I think.
and the mailing list has my posts, is it update daily?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page