I was counting on some condescending, arrogant, accusatory answers like yours.
You kind of set the tone by your initial post. When your first post contains "I am amazed that there are not..." and "With pascal, I have to mickey mouse around..." you're at the very least inviting similarly passioned responses.
Imagine, instead, if you had said something like: "Are there any bash or bash-like instructions for high-level languages...?"
Your post, and the attitude that appears to be associated with it (as confirmed by your response) do not really help your cause. They literally invite people to call you out on mistaken assumptions (i.e. those are not "bash instructions") and they cause many to wonder if you understand the different between a shell scripting environment and a programming langugage.
Plus, you didn't help yourself by failing to include any information about what specific outcome you were looking to reach/obtain, or what OS and development versions you were using to do so.
Just things for you to consider...