Recent

Author Topic: OS-es, obfuscation and strings  (Read 2302 times)

440bx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2019, 05:00:39 pm »
But other people make valid points... you seem to forget that a little.... On many occasions.... O:-)
That's true, maybe someday, after a lot of learning you might be among them.

Still curious about your education: are you a dentist? That happens quite often.... :P
No but, attempting to get a sensible statement out of you is like pulling teeth.
using FPC v3.0.4 and Lazarus 1.8.2 on Windows 7 64bit.

engkin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2019, 06:24:23 pm »
It is embarrassing to see a post that glorifies Pascal on the expense of C++. On the other hand, members like Nitorami and Akira1364 tried a better approach.

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8950
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2019, 06:49:37 pm »
It is embarrassing to see a post that glorifies Pascal on the expense of C++. On the other hand, members like Nitorami and Akira1364 tried a better approach.
I happen to like turmac over concrete, but it depends on the climate I guess.
I am also not glorifying Pascal as such,. Merely pointing out that it is the implementation of a language, not the "hype" that something is superior..
The latter is plainly not true.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2019, 06:52:56 pm by Thaddy »
Most people that want to use threading should learn to patch their jeans first: use a needle.

engkin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2019, 07:09:28 pm »
I happen to like turmac over concrete,
Tarmac?

You don't plan on writing a post to glorify t[u/a]rmac, I hope??!
« Last Edit: March 11, 2019, 07:14:45 pm by engkin »

jamie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1997
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2019, 10:53:28 pm »
I have a complete set of 5.25 floppy install disk with Windows 1.x on it :D

Cyrax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 755
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2019, 02:13:45 pm »
You mean this report? https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=34140
Yes, that's the one I was thinking about.  I believed it got deleted because one day it stopped showing in my list of "Reported by Me" and even now, it doesn't show.  I looked for that bug report and couldn't find it.

Now, I'm really curious, how did you get to it ?

Your report just got closed, not deleted.

By default, all closed bug reports gets filtered out when you browse the Mantis. And they disappear from "Reported by Me" list, too. You can change the filter settings to include the closed ones.

Truly deleted reports are totally gone.

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8950
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2019, 02:22:47 pm »
Tarmac?
Correct. My favorite Scots tend to twist my tongue and my keyboard....
Context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarmacadam
« Last Edit: March 12, 2019, 02:27:19 pm by Thaddy »
Most people that want to use threading should learn to patch their jeans first: use a needle.

440bx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
Re: OS-es, obfuscation and strings
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2019, 03:26:45 pm »
By default, all closed bug reports gets filtered out when you browse the Mantis. And they disappear from "Reported by Me" list, too. You can change the filter settings to include the closed ones.

Truly deleted reports are totally gone.
Thanks Cyrax.  Now, I understand what happened.
using FPC v3.0.4 and Lazarus 1.8.2 on Windows 7 64bit.