Recent

Author Topic: wayland vs mir vs xorg vs X11 ?  (Read 5399 times)

Fred vS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
    • StrumPract is the musicians best friend
wayland vs mir vs xorg vs X11 ?
« on: January 15, 2015, 01:41:29 pm »
Hello.

FPC can deal with X11.

But what about all the others, can somebody explain the advantage of one to others ?

Would it be (extremely) difficult to do the others accessible to FPC ?

What is the future ?

Thanks.
I use Lazarus 2.2.0 32/64 and FPC 3.2.2 32/64 on Debian 11 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 7 32/64, Windows XP 32,  FreeBSD 64.
Widgetset: fpGUI, MSEgui, Win32, GTK2, Qt.

https://github.com/fredvs
https://gitlab.com/fredvs
https://codeberg.org/fredvs

marcov

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11452
  • FPC developer.
Re: wayland vs mir vs xorg vs X11 ?
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2015, 02:05:18 pm »
The main Lazarus *nix widgetsets only use X for some window management. The bulk of the work goes through either GTK or QT.

Wayland (and I assume Mir too) have a base X emulation, but even when that eventually would (a very big IF) disappear then it should be relative benign.

Maybe customdrawn needs some work, otoh it probably doesn't really work with detail X primitives and just cranks out bitmaps.

So nothing to worry about.


Fred vS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
    • StrumPract is the musicians best friend
Re: wayland vs mir vs xorg vs X11 ?
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2015, 03:13:26 pm »
Quote
So nothing to worry about.

 ;)

Thanks Marcov.

Fre;D
I use Lazarus 2.2.0 32/64 and FPC 3.2.2 32/64 on Debian 11 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 7 32/64, Windows XP 32,  FreeBSD 64.
Widgetset: fpGUI, MSEgui, Win32, GTK2, Qt.

https://github.com/fredvs
https://gitlab.com/fredvs
https://codeberg.org/fredvs

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018