Recent

Author Topic: pl_VirtualTrees  (Read 10135 times)

JanRoza

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
    • http://www.silentwings.nl
Re: pl_VirtualTrees
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2013, 09:05:11 pm »
I get the impression that Sternas feels insulted somehow.
There's no need for that, is it so strange that people wonder what differences there are between Lazarus components and CodeTyphon components?
Please let's all stay one big Pascal family and don't go into each others hair over nothing.
We're all on the same side: the Pascal side.
OS: Windows 10 (64 bit) / Linux Mint (64 bit)
       Lazarus 3.2 FPC 3.2.2
       CodeTyphon 8.40 FPC 3.3.1

JD

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: pl_VirtualTrees
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2013, 09:09:41 pm »
I get the impression that Sternas feels insulted somehow.
There's no need for that, is it so strange that people wonder what differences there are between Lazarus components and CodeTyphon components?
Please let's all stay one big Pascal family and don't go into each others hair over nothing.
We're all on the same side: the Pascal side.

I have the same impression too but honestly it was never my intention to do that. I was just stating my observations.
Windows - Lazarus 2.1/FPC 3.2 (built using fpcupdeluxe),
Linux Mint - Lazarus 2.1/FPC 3.2 (built using fpcupdeluxe)

mORMot; Zeos 8; SQLite, PostgreSQL & MariaDB; VirtualTreeView

JuhaManninen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4467
  • I like bugs.
Re: pl_VirtualTrees
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2013, 10:01:26 pm »
I am still puzzled about why Sternas reacted so strong about the VirtualTrees comments.
What was so badly wrong with them? Could you please explain Sternas.
Mostly Lazarus trunk and FPC 3.2 on Manjaro Linux 64-bit.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018