Lazarus
Announcements => Lazarus => Topic started by: Vincent Snijders on February 04, 2013, 03:45:45 pm
-
See next post for message.
-
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.0.6.
This is a bug fix release. Here is the list of changes:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch#Fixes_for_1.0.6_.28Merged.29
The release is available for download at the SourceForge download page:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
Choose your CPU, OS, distro and then the "Lazarus 1.0.6" directory.
Minimum requirements:
Windows: 98, 2k, XP, Vista, 7, 32 or 64bit
FreeBSD/Linux: gtk 2.8 or qt4.5, 32 or 64bit
Mac OS X: 10.5, LCL only 32bit, non LCL apps can be 64bit
This release has been built with fpc 2.6.0 (the former release 1.0.4 was built with that too).
The svn tag is
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/tags/lazarus_1_0_6
For people who are blocked by SF, the Lazarus releases from sourceforge are mirrored at:
ftp://freepascal.dfmk.hu/pub/lazarus/releases/
and later at (after some time for synchronization)
http://michael-ep3.physik.uni-halle.de/Lazarus/releases/
and
http://mirrors.iwi.me/lazarus/
-
Congratulations..
Now downloading from "For people who are blocked by SF" link.
-
Now downloading from "For people who are blocked by SF" link.
Why are you blocked?
-
Because I'm from Sudan.
This blocking has a very big impact to IT here, so that we encourage our people to use open source
-
Why Sudan is blocked?
-
I'll reply to you in your e-mail
-
congratulations you did a good job.
When will there be a version with MacOSX LCL working in cocoa?
Thanks for everything.
-
Special thanks for the link for people who are blocked by SF.
-
Congratulations!! Bravo!!
Thank you all teams for such a nice IDE of Object Pascal.....
-
Thanks for the release, guys... hope this is the last one with FPC 2.6.0...
Why Sudan is blocked?
Ask Sourceforge.
-
Ask Sourceforge.
Or is it the Sudan goverment?
-
No, it's the US government, export controls for encryption etc. Apparently Blowfish is dangerous...
-
Why not sell merchandice with Lazarus/frepascal on it and bringmoney to you. Look at my png.
an exampel to bring money to your project?
http://www.cafepress.com/make/custom-hoodies-sweatshirts
-
FYI, the 1.0.6 installer is identified by Kaspersky Endpoint Security as being infected by Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Gimemo.axlf.
Presumably this is a false positive.
-
FYI, the 1.0.6 installer is identified by Kaspersky Endpoint Security as being infected by Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Gimemo.axlf.
Presumably this is a false positive.
Oops, I should have qualified the above by saying that it is the 32bit installer only that Kaspersky does not like. Specifically, lazarus-1.0.6-fpc-2.6.0-win32.exe
-
When will there be a version with MacOSX LCL working in cocoa?
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Roadmap (note that the target version may change, depending on many aspects)
-
FYI, the 1.0.6 installer is identified by Kaspersky Endpoint Security as being infected by Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Gimemo.axlf.
Presumably this is a false positive.
Oops, I should have qualified the above by saying that it is the 32bit installer only that Kaspersky does not like. Specifically, lazarus-1.0.6-fpc-2.6.0-win32.exe
We are aware of this. It seems to be the lhelp.exe that Kaspersky dislikes (today a few of the less well known scanners, seem to have copied the signature which leads to the alert). Checked a huge selection of the installed files via virustotal.com.
Furthermore: If I strip the file lhelp.exe then it is no longer reported. Strip only removes debug symbols.
If concerned you can always build from source.
There are also (and have at random been) some scanners that pick at the gnu tools. Some of those files being unchanged for more than half a decade (the copy in the fpc svn). Within all those years those files have usually been reported clean.
-
Can you test again with Kaspersky?
I submitted the lhelp file to them for analysis and they confirmed it harmless. It seems they have already updated their signatures too.
-
Brilliant release as always.
I'm currently using the 1.1 WIP versions in my project (I know I shouldn't but it's working so fine).
Congrats to the team for the best Object Pascal IDE in the world.
Andre Guerreiro Neto
-
Very glad that the use of Object Pascal IDE team of Lazarus. I wish you success and continuous improvement.
-
I had 1.1, eventually had 1.04.
Originally fpc 2.60 and upgraded to 2.61.
Now I get the 1.06 64bit version which installs fine. I then run the MSSQL example which says it needs atleast 2.61 to run.
If I install 2.61, it overwrites the new 1.06.
What should I do ?
-
Can't you do the same thing as when you upgraded 2.6.0 to 2.6.1 when you had 1.0.4?
-
Can't you do the same thing as when you upgraded 2.6.0 to 2.6.1 when you had 1.0.4?
Was all a bit of a muddle to be honest. I'll have another try.
Is there any reason why 2.6.1 isn't in the latest build instead of 2.6.0 ?
-
Because it is not a release.
-
Because it is not a release.
I see.
Still new to all this :)
Thanks for your time.
-
You can try:
install 1.1, then 1.0.6 (but skip the uninstall.
I believe 1.1 with 26.1 will install fpc in a folder 2.6.1, so this will be kept.
Otherwise: Copy the fpc folder, after install of 1.1. FInd the file fpc.cfg and fix all pathes inside using a texteditor.
--
In both cases you then need to open the options in Lazarus and point to the right fpc
-
You can try:
install 1.1, then 1.0.6 (but skip the uninstall.
I believe 1.1 with 26.1 will install fpc in a folder 2.6.1, so this will be kept.
Otherwise: Copy the fpc folder, after install of 1.1. FInd the file fpc.cfg and fix all pathes inside using a texteditor.
--
In both cases you then need to open the options in Lazarus and point to the right fpc
Thank you Martin.
-
Great, this is good news (again).
Mac OS X: 10.5, LCL only 32bit, non LCL apps can be 64bit
BTW, unlike Lazarus 1.0.2 and 1.0.4, the 1.0.6 version supports also Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger again. Thank you for your efforts.
-
Thank you guys for the realease. And for providing a link for those who are blocked.
-
Great news, guys! Awesome. Keep up the good work. :)
I have one issue though: After I reinstalled fresh (32-bit, Windows), recompiling Lazarus gave me the (by now well-known, I presume) error about make.exe. Something with error code 255 (I guess it was “make.exe[1]: *** [idepkg] Error 255”), and it’s easily solvable by doing this:
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,18727.msg106408.html#msg106408
Is there any reason why this newer make.exe build is not included in the installer by default? If there is no particular reason, why not simply include it?
Thanks again!
-
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,18727.msg106408.html#msg106408
Is there any reason why this newer make.exe build is not included in the installer by default? If there is no particular reason, why not simply include it?
Perhaps the reason is the bug report mentioned in a post below:
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?topic=18727.msg109153#msg109153
-
Hello! My name is Timur Kuysokov, I live in Buzuluk, Russian Federation. At work, I often encounter a mathematical analysis, in connection with which I developed a module that allows you to carry out the approximation of functions by least squares. At the moment the module supports the model of the form: Y = a * X + b, Y = a * X ^ b, Y = a * b ^ X, Y = e ^ (a + b * X). I have not published a module to open access, as the cook accompanying documentation for it. Individual ownership of the unit, I shed light on the data recorded at the Federal Institute of Industrial Property in Russia.
Dear developers Lazarus, can I carry out the production and support of his unit as a specific module for the environment Lazarus, and also rely on the official publishing it on the forum, as well as on your own site?
p.s. Wrote on rabdnom language. Thanks for the translation translate.google.ru.
-
thank you