One of the demos needs a quick bug fix though -
Test2_Byte2.pas needs another "end;" before the final "end."
Sadly coedit doesnt build out of the zip.You need Lazarus 1.6.4 and FPC 3.0.2. I build the binaries for win32, linux amd64 and linux i386 so i would be aware of such a problem. Lazarus 1.8 is not supported at all.
TcestringHel[per issues. in ce_common
I'm looking for an editor/basic IDE I can use to build an IDE for a programming language
on.
Thanks BB...
I can't use it anyway due to the unusual programming methods and lack of docs - it looks really
good at what it does (based on the screen shot and a scan of the code) . I only commented to try and help.
I'm looking for an editor/basic IDE I can use to build an IDE for a programming language
on.
I doubt it's a good idea to build an entire IDE on your own - especially in 2017. There are so many great and extensible IDEs these days. Why do you want to waste your time with upcoming bugs and feature requests like "Search all files doesn't work wih regular expressions" or "Files with chinese characters don't show up properly"? There are tons of features users need to have implemented before they consider an IDE as good.
If you need a wheel make a plugin for an IDE such as VS, MonoDevelop, Eclipse etc...all have an interface to add language plugins.
Yeah but that's what he wanted. In an IDE i'd say that the GUI part is small and there's much more logic. Just a project template will not prevent him to write hundreds of LOC. A plugin for one of the IDE mentioned above that follows a rationalized interface will.
No need to fight boys!
Eclipse is a suggestion. It's no use to me but that's about all.
[...]
I think we've realised that such a framework doesn't exist so I have to make do.
There was a company selling components, one of them was a docking system. In their example they put an base IDE.If runtime form designer with object inspector is what you look for, then take a look at