the extention of a file is pointless ... the contents mattersI know what you mean, Blestan, but someone who doesn't yet know the difference between a .PRN and .TXT file could misunderstand.
.prn files are print files in general .. open them in an editor and take a look at the content .. it can be postscript or other printer related format ( also .ps is used for postscript )Properly used, a .PRN file contains not just the text/images to be printed, but also all the control codes 'specific' to the printer it was created for, ie. you can't just output a .PRN file created for (say) an Epson colour inkjet to a (say) Cannon inkjet, and certainly not to a Laser Printer. Lasers are generally not so fussy since they pretty much all understand PCL (in whatever version). It would be incorrect to create a PostScript file with a .PRN extension, .PS is the standard.
i can assure you that when you generate a printing file from lets say coreldraw the default extension is prn and the content is postscript ;)Only if the selected printer is a PostScript device.
i have text files with .txt and text files with .prn extensionsSo, what program generated the .txt and .prn files?
is there a difference to look after
ps i want tosplit files because the are too bigDepending on what the content is (and what program generated them) splitting them might not be advisable?
ps i want to split files because the are too big
What format of this files?Can you paste a exemple?
80 MB is not to large file.What RAM Memory in your system.
I have a System to handle text files (csv format, semi colon delimited).