Recent

Author Topic: ImageMagick Wrapper  (Read 3135 times)

turrican

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
  • Pascal is my life.
    • Homepage
ImageMagick Wrapper
« on: December 12, 2017, 01:21:59 pm »
Hi,

On Windows included ImageMagick wrapper http://wiki.freepascal.org/PascalMagick uses  CORE_RL_magick_.dll . This library is not included (replaced). The new library is CORE_RL_Magick++_.dll . Witch version of DLL is compatible with the current wrapper?


turrican

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
  • Pascal is my life.
    • Homepage
Re: ImageMagick Wrapper
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2017, 01:38:17 pm »
Hi,

On Windows included ImageMagick wrapper http://wiki.freepascal.org/PascalMagick uses  CORE_RL_magick_.dll . This library is not included (replaced). The new library is CORE_RL_Magick++_.dll . Witch version of DLL is compatible with the current wrapper?

As I can see the Wrapper is very old and cannot support new libraries. Wrapper needs to be coded again. I'm going to take the C# wrapper and try to port to Pascal. It's not admisible Pascal haven't a working ImageMagick wrapper.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 01:40:47 pm by turrican »

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14205
  • Probably until I exterminate Putin.
Re: ImageMagick Wrapper
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2017, 05:25:04 pm »
The current wrapper still works.... I would not use the C# wrappers, I would use the flattened C interface. https://imagemagick.org/script/api.php
According to the website, the Pascal interface is maintained btw. (Implied) So maybe it needs only a sync. Ask Felipe?
« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 05:30:51 pm by Thaddy »
Specialize a type, not a var.

turrican

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
  • Pascal is my life.
    • Homepage
Re: ImageMagick Wrapper
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2017, 06:00:47 pm »
The current wrapper still works.... I would not use the C# wrappers, I would use the flattened C interface. https://imagemagick.org/script/api.php
According to the website, the Pascal interface is maintained btw. (Implied) So maybe it needs only a sync. Ask Felipe?

Great idea! Current wrapper is well done but a quite outdated. I want to contribute with this but I would like to contact if this package is mantained or not.

Thaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14205
  • Probably until I exterminate Putin.
Re: ImageMagick Wrapper
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2017, 06:03:54 pm »
Well Felipe is reading this forum...
But don't get confused by the header information. Maybe just the header needs an update  :D
Specialize a type, not a var.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018