Non-official observation: It seems like documentation could use an overall indexing effort with maybe some method of marking what's old. For example you'll find at least 3 articles on how to cross-compile to Android by different people at different times. They don't totally supersede each other, each still has valid points. But if you only find one you may not know the others exist. Seems like some cross-linking might be in order. And probably not HTML hyperlinks since the pages may get moved around, more like a reference number in a database.
You may not make much of a dent in 8 hours a week. It almost needs to be something like a grant-funded full-time position for at least a year. Lack of continuity seems to be a problem. There's a ton of documentation, but finding anything is an art form.
I'd like to see everything fit into a tree but not everybody puts things in the same categories. I can't see a simple fix, somebody needs to at least partly understand the material before they can reorganize it. A clerk or secretary would butcher it and make it worse. If you look at the documentation the way you'd look at, say, a Physics textbook, you'd have a table of contents and an index. Here there's the added distraction of running on multiple platforms, so a TOpenDialog in Windows is slightly different than under Linux for example.
Recent
